C&C 25 vs Northern 25
How do the C&C 25 and Northern 25 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 25 
Northern 25 | C&C 25 | Northern 25 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.2 ft7.68 m | 25.3 ft7.70 m |
| Waterline length | 20.5 ft6.25 m | 19.3 ft5.87 m |
| Beam | 8.8 ft2.67 m | 8.2 ft2.49 m |
| Draft | 3.8 ft1.17 m | 4.0 ft1.22 m |
| Displacement | 4,189 lb1,900 kg | 5,100 lb2,313 kg |
| Ballast | 1,984 lb900 kg | 2,300 lb1,043 kg |
| Sail area | 344 ft²32.0 m² | 304 ft²28.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 21.18 | 16.42 |
| Displacement / Length | 217 | 319 |
| Comfort ratio | 16.4 | 22.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.17 | 1.90 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.1 | 5.9 |
| Average used price | €5,000 | — |
C&C 25 vs Northern 25: the short version
- The C&C 25 and Northern 25 are close in length (25.2 ft7.68 m vs 25.3 ft7.70 m ).
- The Northern 25 is heavier, displacing about 22% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 25 carries the more powerful rig (21.2 vs 16.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Northern 25 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Northern 25 rates better for offshore work (1.90 vs 2.17).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.