Canon vs Hunter Xcite
How do the Canon and Hunter Xcite compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Canon | Canon | Hunter Xcite | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 10.1 ft3.07 m | 9.9 ft3.02 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 2.1 ft0.64 m | 4.4 ft1.35 m |
| Draft | —— | 3.2 ft0.97 m |
| Displacement | 26 lb12 kg | 95 lb43 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | —— | 46 ft²4.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | — | 35.35 |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 2.84 | 3.88 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
Canon vs Hunter Xcite: the short version
- The Canon and Hunter Xcite are close in length (10.1 ft3.07 m vs 9.9 ft3.02 m ).
- The Hunter Xcite is heavier, displacing about 265% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Canon rates better for offshore work (2.84 vs 3.88).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.