Cape Cod Cat vs K2
How do the Cape Cod Cat and K2 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Cape Cod Cat | Cape Cod Cat | K2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 17.0 ft5.18 m | 17.0 ft5.18 m |
| Waterline length | 16.4 ft5.00 m | —— |
| Beam | 7.9 ft2.41 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 4.8 ft1.47 m | —— |
| Displacement | 2,200 lb998 kg | 342 lb155 kg |
| Ballast | 500 lb227 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 250 ft²23.2 m² | 171 ft²15.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 23.65 | 55.95 |
| Displacement / Length | 222 | — |
| Comfort ratio | 13.0 | — |
| Capsize screening | 2.44 | 4.58 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.4 | — |
Cape Cod Cat vs K2: the short version
- The Cape Cod Cat and K2 are close in length (17.0 ft5.18 m vs 17.0 ft5.18 m ).
- The Cape Cod Cat is heavier, displacing about 543% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the K2 carries the more powerful rig (55.9 vs 23.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Cape Cod Cat rates better for offshore work (2.44 vs 4.58).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.