Cape Cod Frosty vs Hookipa Naish
How do the Cape Cod Frosty and Hookipa Naish compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Cape Cod Frosty | Cape Cod Frosty | Hookipa Naish | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 6.3 ft1.93 m | 8.5 ft2.60 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 2.8 ft0.84 m | 1.9 ft0.57 m |
| Draft | 3.0 ft0.91 m | —— |
| Displacement | 34 lb15 kg | 18 lb8 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 25 ft²2.3 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 38.11 | — |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 3.41 | 2.85 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
Cape Cod Frosty vs Hookipa Naish: the short version
- The Hookipa Naish is the larger boat at 8.5 ft2.60 m LOA versus 6.3 ft1.93 m for the Cape Cod Frosty.
- The Cape Cod Frosty is heavier, displacing about 89% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hookipa Naish rates better for offshore work (2.85 vs 3.41).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.