Cape Cod Mercury 15 vs Drascombe Scaffie
How do the Cape Cod Mercury 15 and Drascombe Scaffie compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Cape Cod Mercury 15 | Cape Cod Mercury 15 | Drascombe Scaffie | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 15.0 ft4.57 m | 14.8 ft4.50 m |
| Waterline length | 13.8 ft4.22 m | 12.3 ft3.75 m |
| Beam | 5.4 ft1.65 m | 5.7 ft1.75 m |
| Draft | 2.4 ft0.74 m | 1.2 ft0.37 m |
| Displacement | 730 lb331 kg | 463 lb210 kg |
| Ballast | 200 lb91 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 119 ft²11.1 m² | 100 ft²9.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 23.48 | 26.73 |
| Displacement / Length | 123 | 111 |
| Comfort ratio | 8.4 | 5.3 |
| Capsize screening | 2.41 | 2.97 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.0 | 4.7 |
Cape Cod Mercury 15 vs Drascombe Scaffie: the short version
- The Cape Cod Mercury 15 and Drascombe Scaffie are close in length (15.0 ft4.57 m vs 14.8 ft4.50 m ).
- The Cape Cod Mercury 15 is heavier, displacing about 58% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Drascombe Scaffie carries the more powerful rig (26.7 vs 23.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Cape Cod Mercury 15 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Cape Cod Mercury 15 rates better for offshore work (2.41 vs 2.97).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.