Cape Cod Mercury 15 vs West Wight Potter 15
How do the Cape Cod Mercury 15 and West Wight Potter 15 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Cape Cod Mercury 15 | Cape Cod Mercury 15 | West Wight Potter 15 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 15.0 ft4.57 m | 15.0 ft4.57 m |
| Waterline length | 13.8 ft4.22 m | 11.8 ft3.61 m |
| Beam | 5.4 ft1.65 m | 5.5 ft1.68 m |
| Draft | 2.4 ft0.74 m | 3.0 ft0.91 m |
| Displacement | 730 lb331 kg | 475 lb215 kg |
| Ballast | 200 lb91 kg | 165 lb75 kg |
| Sail area | 119 ft²11.1 m² | 111 ft²10.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 23.48 | 29.17 |
| Displacement / Length | 123 | 128 |
| Comfort ratio | 8.4 | 5.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.41 | 2.82 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.0 | 4.6 |
Cape Cod Mercury 15 vs West Wight Potter 15: the short version
- The Cape Cod Mercury 15 and West Wight Potter 15 are close in length (15.0 ft4.57 m vs 15.0 ft4.57 m ).
- The Cape Cod Mercury 15 is heavier, displacing about 54% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the West Wight Potter 15 carries the more powerful rig (29.2 vs 23.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Cape Cod Mercury 15 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Cape Cod Mercury 15 rates better for offshore work (2.41 vs 2.82).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.