Cape Dory 25D vs MacGregor 25
How do the Cape Dory 25D and MacGregor 25 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Cape Dory 25D 
MacGregor 25 | Cape Dory 25D | MacGregor 25 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.0 ft7.62 m | 25.0 ft7.62 m |
| Waterline length | 19.0 ft5.79 m | 23.0 ft7.01 m |
| Beam | 8.0 ft2.44 m | 7.9 ft2.41 m |
| Draft | 3.5 ft1.07 m | 5.7 ft1.73 m |
| Displacement | 5,120 lb2,322 kg | 2,100 lb953 kg |
| Ballast | 2,050 lb930 kg | 625 lb283 kg |
| Sail area | 304 ft²28.2 m² | 251 ft²23.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.37 | 24.49 |
| Displacement / Length | 333 | 77 |
| Comfort ratio | 23.8 | 8.7 |
| Capsize screening | 1.86 | 2.47 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.8 | 6.4 |
Cape Dory 25D vs MacGregor 25: the short version
- The Cape Dory 25D and MacGregor 25 are close in length (25.0 ft7.62 m vs 25.0 ft7.62 m ).
- The Cape Dory 25D is heavier, displacing about 144% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the MacGregor 25 carries the more powerful rig (24.5 vs 16.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Cape Dory 25D scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Cape Dory 25D rates better for offshore work (1.86 vs 2.47).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.