Cape Dory 33 vs Endeavour 33
How do the Cape Dory 33 and Endeavour 33 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Cape Dory 33 
Endeavour 33 | Cape Dory 33 | Endeavour 33 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 33.0 ft10.07 m | 33.0 ft10.06 m |
| Waterline length | 24.5 ft7.47 m | 27.5 ft8.38 m |
| Beam | 10.3 ft3.12 m | 11.5 ft3.51 m |
| Draft | 4.8 ft1.47 m | 4.5 ft1.37 m |
| Displacement | 13,300 lb6,033 kg | 11,350 lb5,148 kg |
| Ballast | 5,500 lb2,495 kg | 4,600 lb2,087 kg |
| Sail area | 539 ft²50.1 m² | 539 ft²50.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.36 | 17.08 |
| Displacement / Length | 404 | 244 |
| Comfort ratio | 34.2 | 23.3 |
| Capsize screening | 1.73 | 2.05 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.6 | 7.0 |
Cape Dory 33 vs Endeavour 33: the short version
- The Cape Dory 33 and Endeavour 33 are close in length (33.0 ft10.07 m vs 33.0 ft10.06 m ).
- The Cape Dory 33 is heavier, displacing about 17% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Endeavour 33 carries the more powerful rig (17.1 vs 15.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Cape Dory 33 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Cape Dory 33 rates better for offshore work (1.73 vs 2.05).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.