Capri 16 vs Catalina 30
How do the Capri 16 and Catalina 30 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
| Capri 16 | Catalina 30 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 16.5 ft5.03 m | 29.9 ft9.12 m |
| Waterline length | 15.5 ft4.72 m | 25.0 ft7.62 m |
| Beam | 6.9 ft2.11 m | 10.8 ft3.30 m |
| Draft | 2.4 ft0.74 m | 5.3 ft1.60 m |
| Displacement | 1,350 lb612 kg | 10,200 lb4,627 kg |
| Ballast | 425 lb193 kg | 4,250 lb1,928 kg |
| Sail area | 138 ft²12.8 m² | 437 ft²40.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.08 | 14.87 |
| Displacement / Length | 162 | 291 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.0 | 24.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.50 | 2.00 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.3 | 6.7 |
Capri 16 vs Catalina 30: the short version
- The Catalina 30 is the larger boat at 29.9 ft9.12 m LOA versus 16.5 ft5.03 m for the Capri 16.
- The Catalina 30 is heavier, displacing about 656% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Capri 16 carries the more powerful rig (18.1 vs 14.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Catalina 30 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Catalina 30 rates better for offshore work (2.00 vs 2.50).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.
Catalina 30