Capri 16 vs Catalina 470
How do the Capri 16 and Catalina 470 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Capri 16 | Capri 16 | Catalina 470 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 16.5 ft5.03 m | 47.7 ft14.53 m |
| Waterline length | 15.5 ft4.72 m | 42.0 ft12.80 m |
| Beam | 6.9 ft2.11 m | 14.0 ft4.27 m |
| Draft | 2.4 ft0.74 m | 7.8 ft2.39 m |
| Displacement | 1,350 lb612 kg | 27,000 lb12,247 kg |
| Ballast | 425 lb193 kg | 8,800 lb3,992 kg |
| Sail area | 138 ft²12.8 m² | 1,010 ft²93.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.08 | 17.96 |
| Displacement / Length | 162 | 163 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.0 | 28.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.50 | 1.87 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.3 | 8.7 |
Capri 16 vs Catalina 470: the short version
- The Catalina 470 is the larger boat at 47.7 ft14.53 m LOA versus 16.5 ft5.03 m for the Capri 16.
- The Catalina 470 is heavier, displacing about 1900% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Capri 16 carries the more powerful rig (18.1 vs 18.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Catalina 470 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Catalina 470 rates better for offshore work (1.87 vs 2.50).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.