Capri 25 vs Catalina 320
How do the Capri 25 and Catalina 320 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Capri 25 
Catalina 320 | Capri 25 | Catalina 320 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.6 ft7.49 m | 32.5 ft9.91 m |
| Waterline length | 19.2 ft5.84 m | 28.0 ft8.53 m |
| Beam | 9.2 ft2.79 m | 11.8 ft3.58 m |
| Draft | 4.2 ft1.28 m | 6.5 ft1.97 m |
| Displacement | 2,950 lb1,338 kg | 11,300 lb5,126 kg |
| Ballast | 900 lb408 kg | 4,000 lb1,814 kg |
| Sail area | 277 ft²25.7 m² | 520 ft²48.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 21.55 | 16.52 |
| Displacement / Length | 187 | 230 |
| Comfort ratio | 11.5 | 22.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.55 | 2.09 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.9 | 7.1 |
Capri 25 vs Catalina 320: the short version
- The Catalina 320 is the larger boat at 32.5 ft9.91 m LOA versus 24.6 ft7.49 m for the Capri 25.
- The Catalina 320 is heavier, displacing about 283% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Capri 25 carries the more powerful rig (21.5 vs 16.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Catalina 320 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Catalina 320 rates better for offshore work (2.09 vs 2.55).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.