Capri 26 vs Tur 80
How do the Capri 26 and Tur 80 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Capri 26 | Capri 26 | Tur 80 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 26.2 ft7.97 m | 26.1 ft7.96 m |
| Waterline length | 22.9 ft6.99 m | 21.5 ft6.55 m |
| Beam | 9.8 ft3.00 m | 8.2 ft2.51 m |
| Draft | 4.8 ft1.47 m | 3.5 ft1.08 m |
| Displacement | 5,250 lb2,381 kg | 5,071 lb2,300 kg |
| Ballast | 1,900 lb862 kg | 1,984 lb900 kg |
| Sail area | 296 ft²27.5 m² | 366 ft²34.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.68 | 19.84 |
| Displacement / Length | 195 | 228 |
| Comfort ratio | 16.2 | 20.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.26 | 1.92 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.4 | 6.2 |
| Average used price | — | €3,100 |
Capri 26 vs Tur 80: the short version
- The Capri 26 and Tur 80 are close in length (26.2 ft7.97 m vs 26.1 ft7.96 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Tur 80 carries the more powerful rig (19.8 vs 15.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Tur 80 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Tur 80 rates better for offshore work (1.92 vs 2.26).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.