Caprice 15 vs Hunter 146
How do the Caprice 15 and Hunter 146 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Caprice 15 | Caprice 15 | Hunter 146 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 14.7 ft4.47 m | 14.5 ft4.42 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 6.0 ft1.84 m | 6.5 ft1.98 m |
| Draft | 3.8 ft1.17 m | 3.0 ft0.91 m |
| Displacement | 250 lb113 kg | 340 lb154 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 123 ft²11.4 m² | 92 ft²8.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 49.59 | 30.22 |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 3.84 | 3.73 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
Caprice 15 vs Hunter 146: the short version
- The Caprice 15 and Hunter 146 are close in length (14.7 ft4.47 m vs 14.5 ft4.42 m ).
- The Hunter 146 is heavier, displacing about 36% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Caprice 15 carries the more powerful rig (49.6 vs 30.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 146 rates better for offshore work (3.73 vs 3.84).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.