Caprice 15 vs Skipjack 15
How do the Caprice 15 and Skipjack 15 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Caprice 15 | Caprice 15 | Skipjack 15 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 14.7 ft4.47 m | 14.6 ft4.44 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 6.0 ft1.84 m | 5.3 ft1.60 m |
| Draft | 3.8 ft1.17 m | 3.8 ft1.17 m |
| Displacement | 250 lb113 kg | 340 lb154 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 123 ft²11.4 m² | 125 ft²11.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 49.59 | 41.06 |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 3.84 | 3.01 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
Caprice 15 vs Skipjack 15: the short version
- The Caprice 15 and Skipjack 15 are close in length (14.7 ft4.47 m vs 14.6 ft4.44 m ).
- The Skipjack 15 is heavier, displacing about 36% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Caprice 15 carries the more powerful rig (49.6 vs 41.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Skipjack 15 rates better for offshore work (3.01 vs 3.84).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.