Captiva 240 vs C&C 24
How do the Captiva 240 and C&C 24 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Captiva 240 
C&C 24 | Captiva 240 | C&C 24 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.0 ft7.32 m | 24.0 ft7.32 m |
| Waterline length | 20.0 ft6.10 m | 19.5 ft5.94 m |
| Beam | 8.2 ft2.49 m | 8.8 ft2.67 m |
| Draft | 4.7 ft1.42 m | 4.0 ft1.22 m |
| Displacement | 2,400 lb1,089 kg | 3,200 lb1,451 kg |
| Ballast | 1,000 lb454 kg | 1,050 lb476 kg |
| Sail area | 280 ft²26.0 m² | 252 ft²23.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 24.99 | 18.57 |
| Displacement / Length | 134 | 193 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.7 | 13.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.44 | 2.38 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.0 | 5.9 |
Captiva 240 vs C&C 24: the short version
- The Captiva 240 and C&C 24 are close in length (24.0 ft7.32 m vs 24.0 ft7.32 m ).
- The C&C 24 is heavier, displacing about 33% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Captiva 240 carries the more powerful rig (25.0 vs 18.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 24 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 24 rates better for offshore work (2.38 vs 2.44).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.