Catalina 16.5 vs Hartley TS16/18/21
How do the Catalina 16.5 and Hartley TS16/18/21 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Catalina 16.5 
Hartley TS16/18/21 | Catalina 16.5 | Hartley TS16/18/21 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 16.3 ft4.98 m | 16.4 ft5.00 m |
| Waterline length | 15.7 ft4.78 m | 14.0 ft4.27 m |
| Beam | 7.0 ft2.13 m | 7.2 ft2.20 m |
| Draft | 4.4 ft1.35 m | 4.1 ft1.24 m |
| Displacement | 430 lb195 kg | 794 lb360 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 150 ft²13.9 m² | 149 ft²13.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 42.13 | 27.80 |
| Displacement / Length | 50 | 129 |
| Comfort ratio | 3.1 | 6.0 |
| Capsize screening | 3.71 | 3.12 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.3 | 5.0 |
Catalina 16.5 vs Hartley TS16/18/21: the short version
- The Catalina 16.5 and Hartley TS16/18/21 are close in length (16.3 ft4.98 m vs 16.4 ft5.00 m ).
- The Hartley TS16/18/21 is heavier, displacing about 85% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Catalina 16.5 carries the more powerful rig (42.1 vs 27.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hartley TS16/18/21 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hartley TS16/18/21 rates better for offshore work (3.12 vs 3.71).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.