Catalina 22 vs Catalina 320
How do the Catalina 22 and Catalina 320 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Catalina 22 
Catalina 320 | Catalina 22 | Catalina 320 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 21.5 ft6.55 m | 32.5 ft9.91 m |
| Waterline length | 19.3 ft5.89 m | 28.0 ft8.53 m |
| Beam | 7.7 ft2.34 m | 11.8 ft3.58 m |
| Draft | 5.0 ft1.52 m | 6.5 ft1.97 m |
| Displacement | 2,490 lb1,129 kg | 11,300 lb5,126 kg |
| Ballast | 450 lb204 kg | 4,000 lb1,814 kg |
| Sail area | 205 ft²19.0 m² | 520 ft²48.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.85 | 16.52 |
| Displacement / Length | 154 | 230 |
| Comfort ratio | 12.8 | 22.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.26 | 2.09 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.9 | 7.1 |
Catalina 22 vs Catalina 320: the short version
- The Catalina 320 is the larger boat at 32.5 ft9.91 m LOA versus 21.5 ft6.55 m for the Catalina 22.
- The Catalina 320 is heavier, displacing about 354% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Catalina 22 carries the more powerful rig (17.9 vs 16.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Catalina 320 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Catalina 320 rates better for offshore work (2.09 vs 2.26).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.