Catalina 22 vs Catalina 34
How do the Catalina 22 and Catalina 34 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Catalina 22 
Catalina 34 | Catalina 22 | Catalina 34 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 21.5 ft6.55 m | 34.5 ft10.52 m |
| Waterline length | 19.3 ft5.89 m | 29.8 ft9.09 m |
| Beam | 7.7 ft2.34 m | 11.8 ft3.58 m |
| Draft | 5.0 ft1.52 m | 5.6 ft1.70 m |
| Displacement | 2,490 lb1,129 kg | 11,950 lb5,420 kg |
| Ballast | 450 lb204 kg | 5,000 lb2,268 kg |
| Sail area | 205 ft²19.0 m² | 523 ft²48.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.85 | 16.01 |
| Displacement / Length | 154 | 201 |
| Comfort ratio | 12.8 | 22.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.26 | 2.06 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.9 | 7.3 |
Catalina 22 vs Catalina 34: the short version
- The Catalina 34 is the larger boat at 34.5 ft10.52 m LOA versus 21.5 ft6.55 m for the Catalina 22.
- The Catalina 34 is heavier, displacing about 380% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Catalina 22 carries the more powerful rig (17.9 vs 16.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Catalina 34 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Catalina 34 rates better for offshore work (2.06 vs 2.26).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.