Catalina 27 vs Stiletto 27
How do the Catalina 27 and Stiletto 27 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Catalina 27 
Stiletto 27 | Catalina 27 | Stiletto 27 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 26.8 ft8.18 m | 26.8 ft8.18 m |
| Waterline length | 21.8 ft6.63 m | 24.0 ft7.32 m |
| Beam | 8.8 ft2.69 m | 13.8 ft4.22 m |
| Draft | 4.0 ft1.22 m | 4.0 ft1.22 m |
| Displacement | 6,850 lb3,107 kg | 1,100 lb499 kg |
| Ballast | 2,700 lb1,225 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 342 ft²31.8 m² | 336 ft²31.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.17 | 50.45 |
| Displacement / Length | 297 | 36 |
| Comfort ratio | 25.0 | 2.1 |
| Capsize screening | 1.86 | 5.36 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 6.6 |
Catalina 27 vs Stiletto 27: the short version
- The Catalina 27 and Stiletto 27 are close in length (26.8 ft8.18 m vs 26.8 ft8.18 m ).
- The Catalina 27 is heavier, displacing about 523% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Stiletto 27 carries the more powerful rig (50.5 vs 15.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Catalina 27 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Catalina 27 rates better for offshore work (1.86 vs 5.36).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.