Catalina 28 vs Neptunkryssare
How do the Catalina 28 and Neptunkryssare compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Catalina 28 
Neptunkryssare | Catalina 28 | Neptunkryssare | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 29.4 ft8.97 m | 29.5 ft9.00 m |
| Waterline length | 23.8 ft7.26 m | 19.2 ft5.85 m |
| Beam | 10.3 ft3.15 m | 6.3 ft1.92 m |
| Draft | 5.2 ft1.57 m | 3.9 ft1.20 m |
| Displacement | 8,300 lb3,765 kg | 2,535 lb1,150 kg |
| Ballast | 3,200 lb1,451 kg | 1,190 lb540 kg |
| Sail area | 369 ft²34.3 m² | 204 ft²19.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 14.40 | 17.56 |
| Displacement / Length | 274 | 160 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.4 | 15.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.04 | 1.85 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.5 | 5.9 |
Catalina 28 vs Neptunkryssare: the short version
- The Catalina 28 and Neptunkryssare are close in length (29.4 ft8.97 m vs 29.5 ft9.00 m ).
- The Catalina 28 is heavier, displacing about 227% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Neptunkryssare carries the more powerful rig (17.6 vs 14.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Catalina 28 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Neptunkryssare rates better for offshore work (1.85 vs 2.04).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.