Catalina 375 vs Eagle 38
How do the Catalina 375 and Eagle 38 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Catalina 375 
Eagle 38 | Catalina 375 | Eagle 38 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 38.5 ft11.73 m | 38.6 ft11.77 m |
| Waterline length | 34.4 ft10.49 m | —— |
| Beam | 13.0 ft3.96 m | 8.5 ft2.60 m |
| Draft | 6.8 ft2.08 m | 4.1 ft1.25 m |
| Displacement | 15,500 lb7,031 kg | 8,378 lb3,800 kg |
| Ballast | 5,200 lb2,359 kg | 2,976 lb1,350 kg |
| Sail area | 646 ft²60.0 m² | 644 ft²59.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.63 | 24.98 |
| Displacement / Length | 170 | — |
| Comfort ratio | 22.1 | — |
| Capsize screening | 2.09 | 1.68 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.9 | — |
Catalina 375 vs Eagle 38: the short version
- The Catalina 375 and Eagle 38 are close in length (38.5 ft11.73 m vs 38.6 ft11.77 m ).
- The Catalina 375 is heavier, displacing about 85% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Eagle 38 carries the more powerful rig (25.0 vs 16.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Eagle 38 rates better for offshore work (1.68 vs 2.09).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.