C&C 1/2 Ton vs C&C 101
How do the C&C 1/2 Ton and C&C 101 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 1/2 Ton | C&C 1/2 Ton | C&C 101 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.4 ft9.27 m | 32.8 ft10.00 m |
| Waterline length | 24.3 ft7.42 m | —— |
| Beam | 10.8 ft3.29 m | 11.0 ft3.34 m |
| Draft | 5.3 ft1.62 m | 6.5 ft1.98 m |
| Displacement | 6,400 lb2,903 kg | 8,100 lb3,674 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 3,351 lb1,520 kg |
| Sail area | 387 ft²36.0 m² | 613 ft²56.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.96 | 24.32 |
| Displacement / Length | 198 | — |
| Comfort ratio | 15.9 | — |
| Capsize screening | 2.33 | 2.18 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.6 | — |
C&C 1/2 Ton vs C&C 101: the short version
- The C&C 101 is the larger boat at 32.8 ft10.00 m LOA versus 30.4 ft9.27 m for the C&C 1/2 Ton.
- The C&C 101 is heavier, displacing about 27% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 101 carries the more powerful rig (24.3 vs 18.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 101 rates better for offshore work (2.18 vs 2.33).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.