C&C 1/2 Ton vs C&C 110
How do the C&C 1/2 Ton and C&C 110 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 1/2 Ton | C&C 1/2 Ton | C&C 110 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.4 ft9.27 m | 36.3 ft11.07 m |
| Waterline length | 24.3 ft7.42 m | 31.5 ft9.60 m |
| Beam | 10.8 ft3.29 m | 12.0 ft3.66 m |
| Draft | 5.3 ft1.62 m | 6.5 ft1.98 m |
| Displacement | 6,400 lb2,903 kg | 10,900 lb4,944 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 4,200 lb1,905 kg |
| Sail area | 387 ft²36.0 m² | 706 ft²65.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.96 | 22.98 |
| Displacement / Length | 198 | 156 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.9 | 18.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.33 | 2.16 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.6 | 7.5 |
C&C 1/2 Ton vs C&C 110: the short version
- The C&C 110 is the larger boat at 36.3 ft11.07 m LOA versus 30.4 ft9.27 m for the C&C 1/2 Ton.
- The C&C 110 is heavier, displacing about 70% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 110 carries the more powerful rig (23.0 vs 18.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 110 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 110 rates better for offshore work (2.16 vs 2.33).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.