C&C 1/2 Ton vs C&C 131
How do the C&C 1/2 Ton and C&C 131 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 1/2 Ton | C&C 1/2 Ton | C&C 131 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.4 ft9.27 m | 43.0 ft13.10 m |
| Waterline length | 24.3 ft7.42 m | 37.2 ft11.35 m |
| Beam | 10.8 ft3.29 m | 13.0 ft3.95 m |
| Draft | 5.3 ft1.62 m | 8.7 ft2.65 m |
| Displacement | 6,400 lb2,903 kg | 16,975 lb7,700 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 6,790 lb3,080 kg |
| Sail area | 387 ft²36.0 m² | 889 ft²82.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.96 | 21.54 |
| Displacement / Length | 198 | 147 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.9 | 22.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.33 | 2.02 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.6 | 8.2 |
C&C 1/2 Ton vs C&C 131: the short version
- The C&C 131 is the larger boat at 43.0 ft13.10 m LOA versus 30.4 ft9.27 m for the C&C 1/2 Ton.
- The C&C 131 is heavier, displacing about 165% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 131 carries the more powerful rig (21.5 vs 18.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 131 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 131 rates better for offshore work (2.02 vs 2.33).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.