C&C 1/2 Ton vs C&C 26
How do the C&C 1/2 Ton and C&C 26 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 1/2 Ton 
C&C 26 | C&C 1/2 Ton | C&C 26 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.4 ft9.27 m | 25.6 ft7.80 m |
| Waterline length | 24.3 ft7.42 m | 23.6 ft7.19 m |
| Beam | 10.8 ft3.29 m | 10.4 ft3.18 m |
| Draft | 5.3 ft1.62 m | 4.6 ft1.40 m |
| Displacement | 6,400 lb2,903 kg | 5,400 lb2,449 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 2,040 lb925 kg |
| Sail area | 387 ft²36.0 m² | 331 ft²30.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.96 | 17.21 |
| Displacement / Length | 198 | 184 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.9 | 15.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.33 | 2.38 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.6 | 6.5 |
C&C 1/2 Ton vs C&C 26: the short version
- The C&C 1/2 Ton is the larger boat at 30.4 ft9.27 m LOA versus 25.6 ft7.80 m for the C&C 26.
- The C&C 1/2 Ton is heavier, displacing about 19% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 1/2 Ton carries the more powerful rig (18.0 vs 17.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 1/2 Ton scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 1/2 Ton rates better for offshore work (2.33 vs 2.38).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.