C&C 1/2 Ton vs C&C 30
How do the C&C 1/2 Ton and C&C 30 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 1/2 Ton 
C&C 30 | C&C 1/2 Ton | C&C 30 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.4 ft9.27 m | 30.0 ft9.14 m |
| Waterline length | 24.3 ft7.42 m | 24.9 ft7.60 m |
| Beam | 10.8 ft3.29 m | 10.0 ft3.05 m |
| Draft | 5.3 ft1.62 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 6,400 lb2,903 kg | 8,000 lb3,629 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 3,450 lb1,565 kg |
| Sail area | 387 ft²36.0 m² | 459 ft²42.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.96 | 18.36 |
| Displacement / Length | 198 | 231 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.9 | 21.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.33 | 2.00 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.6 | 6.7 |
C&C 1/2 Ton vs C&C 30: the short version
- The C&C 1/2 Ton and C&C 30 are close in length (30.4 ft9.27 m vs 30.0 ft9.14 m ).
- The C&C 30 is heavier, displacing about 25% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 30 carries the more powerful rig (18.4 vs 18.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 30 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 30 rates better for offshore work (2.00 vs 2.33).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.