C&C 1/2 Ton vs C&C 33
How do the C&C 1/2 Ton and C&C 33 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 1/2 Ton 
C&C 33 | C&C 1/2 Ton | C&C 33 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.4 ft9.27 m | 32.9 ft10.02 m |
| Waterline length | 24.3 ft7.42 m | 26.4 ft8.05 m |
| Beam | 10.8 ft3.29 m | 10.5 ft3.20 m |
| Draft | 5.3 ft1.62 m | 5.5 ft1.68 m |
| Displacement | 6,400 lb2,903 kg | 9,800 lb4,445 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 4,075 lb1,848 kg |
| Sail area | 387 ft²36.0 m² | 501 ft²46.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.96 | 17.50 |
| Displacement / Length | 198 | 237 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.9 | 23.3 |
| Capsize screening | 2.33 | 1.96 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.6 | 6.9 |
C&C 1/2 Ton vs C&C 33: the short version
- The C&C 33 is the larger boat at 32.9 ft10.02 m LOA versus 30.4 ft9.27 m for the C&C 1/2 Ton.
- The C&C 33 is heavier, displacing about 53% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 1/2 Ton carries the more powerful rig (18.0 vs 17.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 33 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 33 rates better for offshore work (1.96 vs 2.33).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.