C&C 1/2 Ton vs C&C 41
How do the C&C 1/2 Ton and C&C 41 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 1/2 Ton | C&C 1/2 Ton | C&C 41 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.4 ft9.27 m | 40.8 ft12.42 m |
| Waterline length | 24.3 ft7.42 m | 33.3 ft10.16 m |
| Beam | 10.8 ft3.29 m | 12.9 ft3.94 m |
| Draft | 5.3 ft1.62 m | 7.8 ft2.38 m |
| Displacement | 6,400 lb2,903 kg | 17,500 lb7,938 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 8,000 lb3,629 kg |
| Sail area | 387 ft²36.0 m² | 812 ft²75.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.96 | 19.27 |
| Displacement / Length | 198 | 211 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.9 | 25.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.33 | 1.99 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.6 | 7.7 |
C&C 1/2 Ton vs C&C 41: the short version
- The C&C 41 is the larger boat at 40.8 ft12.42 m LOA versus 30.4 ft9.27 m for the C&C 1/2 Ton.
- The C&C 41 is heavier, displacing about 173% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 41 carries the more powerful rig (19.3 vs 18.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 41 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 41 rates better for offshore work (1.99 vs 2.33).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.