C&C 1/2 Ton vs C&C 43-1
How do the C&C 1/2 Ton and C&C 43-1 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 1/2 Ton 
C&C 43-1 | C&C 1/2 Ton | C&C 43-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.4 ft9.27 m | 43.3 ft13.21 m |
| Waterline length | 24.3 ft7.42 m | 35.0 ft10.67 m |
| Beam | 10.8 ft3.29 m | 12.8 ft3.91 m |
| Draft | 5.3 ft1.62 m | 7.0 ft2.13 m |
| Displacement | 6,400 lb2,903 kg | 21,314 lb9,668 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 9,980 lb4,527 kg |
| Sail area | 387 ft²36.0 m² | 901 ft²83.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.96 | 18.75 |
| Displacement / Length | 198 | 222 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.9 | 29.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.33 | 1.85 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.6 | 7.9 |
C&C 1/2 Ton vs C&C 43-1: the short version
- The C&C 43-1 is the larger boat at 43.3 ft13.21 m LOA versus 30.4 ft9.27 m for the C&C 1/2 Ton.
- The C&C 43-1 is heavier, displacing about 233% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 43-1 carries the more powerful rig (18.8 vs 18.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 43-1 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 43-1 rates better for offshore work (1.85 vs 2.33).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.