C&C 1/2 Ton vs C&C 45
How do the C&C 1/2 Ton and C&C 45 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 1/2 Ton | C&C 1/2 Ton | C&C 45 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.4 ft9.27 m | 45.3 ft13.79 m |
| Waterline length | 24.3 ft7.42 m | 39.1 ft11.91 m |
| Beam | 10.8 ft3.29 m | 13.8 ft4.19 m |
| Draft | 5.3 ft1.62 m | 8.8 ft2.67 m |
| Displacement | 6,400 lb2,903 kg | 19,100 lb8,664 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 9,800 lb4,445 kg |
| Sail area | 387 ft²36.0 m² | 1,107 ft²102.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.96 | 24.79 |
| Displacement / Length | 198 | 143 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.9 | 22.0 |
| Capsize screening | 2.33 | 2.06 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.6 | 8.4 |
C&C 1/2 Ton vs C&C 45: the short version
- The C&C 45 is the larger boat at 45.3 ft13.79 m LOA versus 30.4 ft9.27 m for the C&C 1/2 Ton.
- The C&C 45 is heavier, displacing about 198% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 45 carries the more powerful rig (24.8 vs 18.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 45 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 45 rates better for offshore work (2.06 vs 2.33).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.