C&C 1/2 Ton vs C&C 50
How do the C&C 1/2 Ton and C&C 50 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 1/2 Ton | C&C 1/2 Ton | C&C 50 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.4 ft9.27 m | 49.8 ft15.19 m |
| Waterline length | 24.3 ft7.42 m | 39.0 ft11.89 m |
| Beam | 10.8 ft3.29 m | 14.5 ft4.42 m |
| Draft | 5.3 ft1.62 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Displacement | 6,400 lb2,903 kg | 31,100 lb14,107 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 15,000 lb6,804 kg |
| Sail area | 387 ft²36.0 m² | 1,273 ft²118.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.96 | 20.60 |
| Displacement / Length | 198 | 234 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.9 | 32.3 |
| Capsize screening | 2.33 | 1.84 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.6 | 8.4 |
C&C 1/2 Ton vs C&C 50: the short version
- The C&C 50 is the larger boat at 49.8 ft15.19 m LOA versus 30.4 ft9.27 m for the C&C 1/2 Ton.
- The C&C 50 is heavier, displacing about 386% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 50 carries the more powerful rig (20.6 vs 18.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 50 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 50 rates better for offshore work (1.84 vs 2.33).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.