C&C 1/2 Ton vs C&C Landfall 39
How do the C&C 1/2 Ton and C&C Landfall 39 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 1/2 Ton | C&C 1/2 Ton | C&C Landfall 39 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.4 ft9.27 m | 38.8 ft11.81 m |
| Waterline length | 24.3 ft7.42 m | 31.0 ft9.45 m |
| Beam | 10.8 ft3.29 m | 12.2 ft3.73 m |
| Draft | 5.3 ft1.62 m | 5.5 ft1.68 m |
| Displacement | 6,400 lb2,903 kg | 19,497 lb8,844 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 6,248 lb2,834 kg |
| Sail area | 387 ft²36.0 m² | 667 ft²62.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.96 | 14.73 |
| Displacement / Length | 198 | 292 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.9 | 32.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.33 | 1.82 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.6 | 7.5 |
C&C 1/2 Ton vs C&C Landfall 39: the short version
- The C&C Landfall 39 is the larger boat at 38.8 ft11.81 m LOA versus 30.4 ft9.27 m for the C&C 1/2 Ton.
- The C&C Landfall 39 is heavier, displacing about 205% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 1/2 Ton carries the more powerful rig (18.0 vs 14.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C Landfall 39 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C Landfall 39 rates better for offshore work (1.82 vs 2.33).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.