C&C 1/2 Ton vs C&C SR 25
How do the C&C 1/2 Ton and C&C SR 25 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 1/2 Ton | C&C 1/2 Ton | C&C SR 25 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.4 ft9.27 m | 25.5 ft7.77 m |
| Waterline length | 24.3 ft7.42 m | 21.0 ft6.40 m |
| Beam | 10.8 ft3.29 m | 8.5 ft2.59 m |
| Draft | 5.3 ft1.62 m | 5.4 ft1.65 m |
| Displacement | 6,400 lb2,903 kg | 1,860 lb844 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 387 ft²36.0 m² | 2,074 ft²192.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.96 | 219.41 |
| Displacement / Length | 198 | 90 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.9 | 7.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.33 | 2.76 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.6 | 6.1 |
C&C 1/2 Ton vs C&C SR 25: the short version
- The C&C 1/2 Ton is the larger boat at 30.4 ft9.27 m LOA versus 25.5 ft7.77 m for the C&C SR 25.
- The C&C 1/2 Ton is heavier, displacing about 244% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C SR 25 carries the more powerful rig (219.4 vs 18.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 1/2 Ton scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 1/2 Ton rates better for offshore work (2.33 vs 2.76).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.