C&C 1/2 Ton vs C&C SR 27
How do the C&C 1/2 Ton and C&C SR 27 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 1/2 Ton | C&C 1/2 Ton | C&C SR 27 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.4 ft9.27 m | 27.5 ft8.38 m |
| Waterline length | 24.3 ft7.42 m | 24.0 ft7.32 m |
| Beam | 10.8 ft3.29 m | 9.5 ft2.90 m |
| Draft | 5.3 ft1.62 m | 5.2 ft1.59 m |
| Displacement | 6,400 lb2,903 kg | 3,750 lb1,701 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 387 ft²36.0 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 17.96 | — |
| Displacement / Length | 198 | 121 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.9 | 11.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.33 | 2.45 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.6 | 6.6 |
C&C 1/2 Ton vs C&C SR 27: the short version
- The C&C 1/2 Ton is the larger boat at 30.4 ft9.27 m LOA versus 27.5 ft8.38 m for the C&C SR 27.
- The C&C 1/2 Ton is heavier, displacing about 71% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The C&C 1/2 Ton scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 1/2 Ton rates better for offshore work (2.33 vs 2.45).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.