C&C 1/2 Ton vs C&C SR 33
How do the C&C 1/2 Ton and C&C SR 33 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 1/2 Ton | C&C 1/2 Ton | C&C SR 33 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.4 ft9.27 m | 33.1 ft10.08 m |
| Waterline length | 24.3 ft7.42 m | 27.8 ft8.46 m |
| Beam | 10.8 ft3.29 m | 11.4 ft3.48 m |
| Draft | 5.3 ft1.62 m | 7.0 ft2.13 m |
| Displacement | 6,400 lb2,903 kg | 5,372 lb2,437 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 387 ft²36.0 m² | 541 ft²50.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.96 | 28.22 |
| Displacement / Length | 198 | 112 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.9 | 11.0 |
| Capsize screening | 2.33 | 2.61 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.6 | 7.1 |
C&C 1/2 Ton vs C&C SR 33: the short version
- The C&C SR 33 is the larger boat at 33.1 ft10.08 m LOA versus 30.4 ft9.27 m for the C&C 1/2 Ton.
- The C&C 1/2 Ton is heavier, displacing about 19% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C SR 33 carries the more powerful rig (28.2 vs 18.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 1/2 Ton scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 1/2 Ton rates better for offshore work (2.33 vs 2.61).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.