C&C 1/2 Ton vs Landfall 35
How do the C&C 1/2 Ton and Landfall 35 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 1/2 Ton | C&C 1/2 Ton | Landfall 35 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.4 ft9.27 m | 34.9 ft10.64 m |
| Waterline length | 24.3 ft7.42 m | 26.8 ft8.15 m |
| Beam | 10.8 ft3.29 m | 10.7 ft3.25 m |
| Draft | 5.3 ft1.62 m | 4.8 ft1.47 m |
| Displacement | 6,400 lb2,903 kg | 13,000 lb5,897 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 5,500 lb2,495 kg |
| Sail area | 387 ft²36.0 m² | 517 ft²48.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.96 | 14.96 |
| Displacement / Length | 198 | 303 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.9 | 29.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.33 | 1.82 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.6 | 6.9 |
C&C 1/2 Ton vs Landfall 35: the short version
- The Landfall 35 is the larger boat at 34.9 ft10.64 m LOA versus 30.4 ft9.27 m for the C&C 1/2 Ton.
- The Landfall 35 is heavier, displacing about 103% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 1/2 Ton carries the more powerful rig (18.0 vs 15.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Landfall 35 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Landfall 35 rates better for offshore work (1.82 vs 2.33).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.