C&C 1/2 Ton vs Southern Cross 28
How do the C&C 1/2 Ton and Southern Cross 28 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 1/2 Ton | C&C 1/2 Ton | Southern Cross 28 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.4 ft9.27 m | 30.4 ft9.27 m |
| Waterline length | 24.3 ft7.42 m | 20.2 ft6.15 m |
| Beam | 10.8 ft3.29 m | 8.5 ft2.59 m |
| Draft | 5.3 ft1.62 m | 4.7 ft1.42 m |
| Displacement | 6,400 lb2,903 kg | 8,500 lb3,856 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 3,400 lb1,542 kg |
| Sail area | 387 ft²36.0 m² | 415 ft²38.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.96 | 15.94 |
| Displacement / Length | 198 | 462 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.9 | 32.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.33 | 1.67 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.6 | 6.0 |
C&C 1/2 Ton vs Southern Cross 28: the short version
- The C&C 1/2 Ton and Southern Cross 28 are close in length (30.4 ft9.27 m vs 30.4 ft9.27 m ).
- The Southern Cross 28 is heavier, displacing about 33% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 1/2 Ton carries the more powerful rig (18.0 vs 15.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Southern Cross 28 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Southern Cross 28 rates better for offshore work (1.67 vs 2.33).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.