C&C 101 vs C&C 115
How do the C&C 101 and C&C 115 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 101 
C&C 115 | C&C 101 | C&C 115 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 32.8 ft10.00 m | 37.8 ft11.51 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 33.0 ft10.06 m |
| Beam | 11.0 ft3.34 m | 11.9 ft3.63 m |
| Draft | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 6.7 ft2.03 m |
| Displacement | 8,100 lb3,674 kg | 11,800 lb5,352 kg |
| Ballast | 3,351 lb1,520 kg | 4,200 lb1,905 kg |
| Sail area | 613 ft²56.9 m² | 781 ft²72.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 24.32 | 24.11 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 147 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 19.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.18 | 2.09 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 7.7 |
C&C 101 vs C&C 115: the short version
- The C&C 115 is the larger boat at 37.8 ft11.51 m LOA versus 32.8 ft10.00 m for the C&C 101.
- The C&C 115 is heavier, displacing about 46% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 101 carries the more powerful rig (24.3 vs 24.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 115 rates better for offshore work (2.09 vs 2.18).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.