C&C 101 vs C&C 131
How do the C&C 101 and C&C 131 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 101 | C&C 101 | C&C 131 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 32.8 ft10.00 m | 43.0 ft13.10 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 37.2 ft11.35 m |
| Beam | 11.0 ft3.34 m | 13.0 ft3.95 m |
| Draft | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 8.7 ft2.65 m |
| Displacement | 8,100 lb3,674 kg | 16,975 lb7,700 kg |
| Ballast | 3,351 lb1,520 kg | 6,790 lb3,080 kg |
| Sail area | 613 ft²56.9 m² | 889 ft²82.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 24.32 | 21.54 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 147 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 22.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.18 | 2.02 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 8.2 |
C&C 101 vs C&C 131: the short version
- The C&C 131 is the larger boat at 43.0 ft13.10 m LOA versus 32.8 ft10.00 m for the C&C 101.
- The C&C 131 is heavier, displacing about 110% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 101 carries the more powerful rig (24.3 vs 21.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 131 rates better for offshore work (2.02 vs 2.18).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.