C&C 101 vs C&C 24
How do the C&C 101 and C&C 24 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 101 
C&C 24 | C&C 101 | C&C 24 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 32.8 ft10.00 m | 24.0 ft7.32 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 19.5 ft5.94 m |
| Beam | 11.0 ft3.34 m | 8.8 ft2.67 m |
| Draft | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 4.0 ft1.22 m |
| Displacement | 8,100 lb3,674 kg | 3,200 lb1,451 kg |
| Ballast | 3,351 lb1,520 kg | 1,050 lb476 kg |
| Sail area | 613 ft²56.9 m² | 252 ft²23.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 24.32 | 18.57 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 193 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 13.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.18 | 2.38 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 5.9 |
C&C 101 vs C&C 24: the short version
- The C&C 101 is the larger boat at 32.8 ft10.00 m LOA versus 24.0 ft7.32 m for the C&C 24.
- The C&C 101 is heavier, displacing about 153% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 101 carries the more powerful rig (24.3 vs 18.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 101 rates better for offshore work (2.18 vs 2.38).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.