C&C 101 vs C&C 25
How do the C&C 101 and C&C 25 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 101 
C&C 25 | C&C 101 | C&C 25 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 32.8 ft10.00 m | 25.2 ft7.67 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 20.7 ft6.30 m |
| Beam | 11.0 ft3.34 m | 8.6 ft2.62 m |
| Draft | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 3.8 ft1.14 m |
| Displacement | 8,100 lb3,674 kg | 4,300 lb1,950 kg |
| Ballast | 3,351 lb1,520 kg | 1,900 lb862 kg |
| Sail area | 613 ft²56.9 m² | 306 ft²28.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 24.32 | 18.52 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 217 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 17.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.18 | 2.11 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 6.1 |
C&C 101 vs C&C 25: the short version
- The C&C 101 is the larger boat at 32.8 ft10.00 m LOA versus 25.2 ft7.67 m for the C&C 25.
- The C&C 101 is heavier, displacing about 88% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 101 carries the more powerful rig (24.3 vs 18.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 25 rates better for offshore work (2.11 vs 2.18).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.