C&C 101 vs C&C 29
How do the C&C 101 and C&C 29 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 101 
C&C 29 | C&C 101 | C&C 29 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 32.8 ft10.00 m | 29.6 ft9.02 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 23.6 ft7.19 m |
| Beam | 11.0 ft3.34 m | 10.3 ft3.15 m |
| Draft | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 5.3 ft1.60 m |
| Displacement | 8,100 lb3,674 kg | 7,500 lb3,402 kg |
| Ballast | 3,351 lb1,520 kg | 2,700 lb1,225 kg |
| Sail area | 613 ft²56.9 m² | 422 ft²39.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 24.32 | 17.62 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 255 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 20.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.18 | 2.11 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 6.5 |
C&C 101 vs C&C 29: the short version
- The C&C 101 is the larger boat at 32.8 ft10.00 m LOA versus 29.6 ft9.02 m for the C&C 29.
- The C&C 101 is heavier, displacing about 8% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 101 carries the more powerful rig (24.3 vs 17.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 29 rates better for offshore work (2.11 vs 2.18).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.