C&C 101 vs C&C 30
How do the C&C 101 and C&C 30 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 101 
C&C 30 | C&C 101 | C&C 30 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 32.8 ft10.00 m | 30.0 ft9.14 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 24.9 ft7.60 m |
| Beam | 11.0 ft3.34 m | 10.0 ft3.05 m |
| Draft | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 8,100 lb3,674 kg | 8,000 lb3,629 kg |
| Ballast | 3,351 lb1,520 kg | 3,450 lb1,565 kg |
| Sail area | 613 ft²56.9 m² | 459 ft²42.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 24.32 | 18.36 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 231 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 21.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.18 | 2.00 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 6.7 |
C&C 101 vs C&C 30: the short version
- The C&C 101 is the larger boat at 32.8 ft10.00 m LOA versus 30.0 ft9.14 m for the C&C 30.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 101 carries the more powerful rig (24.3 vs 18.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 30 rates better for offshore work (2.00 vs 2.18).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.