C&C 101 vs C&C 34
How do the C&C 101 and C&C 34 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 101 
C&C 34 | C&C 101 | C&C 34 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 32.8 ft10.00 m | 33.5 ft10.21 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 25.9 ft7.90 m |
| Beam | 11.0 ft3.34 m | 11.0 ft3.35 m |
| Draft | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 5.9 ft1.80 m |
| Displacement | 8,100 lb3,674 kg | 10,100 lb4,581 kg |
| Ballast | 3,351 lb1,520 kg | 4,100 lb1,860 kg |
| Sail area | 613 ft²56.9 m² | 517 ft²48.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 24.32 | 17.70 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 259 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 22.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.18 | 2.04 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 6.8 |
C&C 101 vs C&C 34: the short version
- The C&C 34 is the larger boat at 33.5 ft10.21 m LOA versus 32.8 ft10.00 m for the C&C 101.
- The C&C 34 is heavier, displacing about 25% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 101 carries the more powerful rig (24.3 vs 17.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 34 rates better for offshore work (2.04 vs 2.18).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.