C&C 101 vs C&C 36R
How do the C&C 101 and C&C 36R compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 101 | C&C 101 | C&C 36R | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 32.8 ft10.00 m | 35.1 ft10.69 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 30.5 ft9.30 m |
| Beam | 11.0 ft3.34 m | 11.2 ft3.40 m |
| Draft | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 6.0 ft1.83 m |
| Displacement | 8,100 lb3,674 kg | 12,700 lb5,761 kg |
| Ballast | 3,351 lb1,520 kg | 6,030 lb2,735 kg |
| Sail area | 613 ft²56.9 m² | 632 ft²58.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 24.32 | 18.58 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 200 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 24.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.18 | 1.92 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 7.4 |
C&C 101 vs C&C 36R: the short version
- The C&C 36R is the larger boat at 35.1 ft10.69 m LOA versus 32.8 ft10.00 m for the C&C 101.
- The C&C 36R is heavier, displacing about 57% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 101 carries the more powerful rig (24.3 vs 18.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 36R rates better for offshore work (1.92 vs 2.18).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.