C&C 101 vs C&C 38
How do the C&C 101 and C&C 38 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 101 
C&C 38 | C&C 101 | C&C 38 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 32.8 ft10.00 m | 37.6 ft11.45 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 29.3 ft8.94 m |
| Beam | 11.0 ft3.34 m | 12.2 ft3.71 m |
| Draft | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 6.4 ft1.96 m |
| Displacement | 8,100 lb3,674 kg | 14,700 lb6,668 kg |
| Ballast | 3,351 lb1,520 kg | 4,400 lb1,996 kg |
| Sail area | 613 ft²56.9 m² | 674 ft²62.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 24.32 | 17.97 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 260 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 25.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.18 | 1.99 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 7.3 |
C&C 101 vs C&C 38: the short version
- The C&C 38 is the larger boat at 37.6 ft11.45 m LOA versus 32.8 ft10.00 m for the C&C 101.
- The C&C 38 is heavier, displacing about 81% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 101 carries the more powerful rig (24.3 vs 18.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 38 rates better for offshore work (1.99 vs 2.18).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.