C&C 101 vs C&C 42 Custom
How do the C&C 101 and C&C 42 Custom compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 101 | C&C 101 | C&C 42 Custom | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 32.8 ft10.00 m | 42.5 ft12.95 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 34.3 ft10.44 m |
| Beam | 11.0 ft3.34 m | 12.9 ft3.94 m |
| Draft | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 7.0 ft2.13 m |
| Displacement | 8,100 lb3,674 kg | 20,000 lb9,072 kg |
| Ballast | 3,351 lb1,520 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 613 ft²56.9 m² | 835 ft²77.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 24.32 | 18.13 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 222 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 27.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.18 | 1.90 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 7.8 |
C&C 101 vs C&C 42 Custom: the short version
- The C&C 42 Custom is the larger boat at 42.5 ft12.95 m LOA versus 32.8 ft10.00 m for the C&C 101.
- The C&C 42 Custom is heavier, displacing about 147% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 101 carries the more powerful rig (24.3 vs 18.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 42 Custom rates better for offshore work (1.90 vs 2.18).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.