C&C 101 vs C&C 43-2
How do the C&C 101 and C&C 43-2 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 101 | C&C 101 | C&C 43-2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 32.8 ft10.00 m | 43.0 ft13.11 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 34.7 ft10.57 m |
| Beam | 11.0 ft3.34 m | 13.8 ft4.22 m |
| Draft | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 8.1 ft2.47 m |
| Displacement | 8,100 lb3,674 kg | 18,900 lb8,573 kg |
| Ballast | 3,351 lb1,520 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 613 ft²56.9 m² | 847 ft²78.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 24.32 | 19.10 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 202 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 23.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.18 | 2.08 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 7.9 |
C&C 101 vs C&C 43-2: the short version
- The C&C 43-2 is the larger boat at 43.0 ft13.11 m LOA versus 32.8 ft10.00 m for the C&C 101.
- The C&C 43-2 is heavier, displacing about 133% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 101 carries the more powerful rig (24.3 vs 19.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 43-2 rates better for offshore work (2.08 vs 2.18).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.