C&C 101 vs C&C 45
How do the C&C 101 and C&C 45 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 101 | C&C 101 | C&C 45 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 32.8 ft10.00 m | 45.3 ft13.79 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 39.1 ft11.91 m |
| Beam | 11.0 ft3.34 m | 13.8 ft4.19 m |
| Draft | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 8.8 ft2.67 m |
| Displacement | 8,100 lb3,674 kg | 19,100 lb8,664 kg |
| Ballast | 3,351 lb1,520 kg | 9,800 lb4,445 kg |
| Sail area | 613 ft²56.9 m² | 1,107 ft²102.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 24.32 | 24.79 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 143 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 22.0 |
| Capsize screening | 2.18 | 2.06 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 8.4 |
C&C 101 vs C&C 45: the short version
- The C&C 45 is the larger boat at 45.3 ft13.79 m LOA versus 32.8 ft10.00 m for the C&C 101.
- The C&C 45 is heavier, displacing about 136% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 45 carries the more powerful rig (24.8 vs 24.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 45 rates better for offshore work (2.06 vs 2.18).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.