C&C 101 vs C&C 50
How do the C&C 101 and C&C 50 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 101 | C&C 101 | C&C 50 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 32.8 ft10.00 m | 49.8 ft15.19 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 39.0 ft11.89 m |
| Beam | 11.0 ft3.34 m | 14.5 ft4.42 m |
| Draft | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Displacement | 8,100 lb3,674 kg | 31,100 lb14,107 kg |
| Ballast | 3,351 lb1,520 kg | 15,000 lb6,804 kg |
| Sail area | 613 ft²56.9 m² | 1,273 ft²118.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 24.32 | 20.60 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 234 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 32.3 |
| Capsize screening | 2.18 | 1.84 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 8.4 |
C&C 101 vs C&C 50: the short version
- The C&C 50 is the larger boat at 49.8 ft15.19 m LOA versus 32.8 ft10.00 m for the C&C 101.
- The C&C 50 is heavier, displacing about 284% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 101 carries the more powerful rig (24.3 vs 20.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 50 rates better for offshore work (1.84 vs 2.18).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.